The Other Research

After reading Paffi Floodā€™s article about that newĀ Beaver Bum smell, I donā€™t feel so bad about todayā€™s google searches, which include best easy-open pocket knives, MAPP gas, and a variety of facts about the Tacoma Police Department in 1922. My search history may imply an interest in violence, safe breaking and the local politics of the early twentieth century, but at least I have not learned anything horrifying about ice cream.

ab99bbc9861b00fbd1fc7ed59872d7bce656341b28c89b620d85774f3ee77e29

It has been noted on more than one occasion that mystery writers tend to have rather disturbing research patterns. But really, of course we do. No one wants to get that detail about corpse bloat wrong. So embarrassing ā€“ how could I face the other writers at the conventions? But the other, less disturbing, research rarely gets mentioned. What gets served in high-school lunches these days? Hint: tater tots are still going strong. What are the three laws of robotics again? (Answer here) What brand would a black, vegetarian, female computer hacker smoke? Turns out itā€™s either Newport Menthols or American Spirit Organics. What do ballet dancers do strengthen their feet? (Video here)

crediblehulkMy point? Thereā€™s a lot more research that goes into a work of fiction than just what happened to the dead guy. But that research isnā€™t particularly titillating. Itā€™s simply the stuff we bore you with at cocktail parties. What I find interesting is that almost every person Iā€™ve ever met has been an expert in something, from baking, bagpiping, needlepoint, and cars, to wood working, plumbing, or how the brakes on busses work. I never know when Iā€™m going to need that expertise, but I like to keep track of my various experts. After all, I never know when Iā€™m going to need to know how to crash a bus full of bagpipers. Not that I would ever publically admit to mentally cataloging my acquaintances by how useful they could be to future researchā€¦

 

Originally posted at the Stiletto Gang on 12.14.16

Binary Thanks

For me, Thanksgiving and the coming end of the year frequently combine to make me philosophical and prone to navel gazing.Ā  Just what have I been doing with my life?Ā  Am I grateful? Am I curating my life in the path of gratitude? Do I even want to?Ā  Why should I have to? Is this my problem? Is this my fault?Ā  Then I start humming Paul Simonā€™s ā€œGumbootsā€ and then go shove some pumpkin pie in my face.

Tuesdayā€™s Stiletto Gang post from J.M. Phillippe discussed the nature of gratitude, particularly in the face of difficult times ā€“ When Gratitude isnā€™t Easy ā€“ and struck a chord with me.Ā  I thought she expressed beautifully the idea that gratitude is not a binary thing, itā€™s a plus thing.Ā  Gratitude can be added like a spice to any recipe.Ā  Even if Iā€™m feeling other things, it doesnā€™t mean I canā€™t feel gratitude.

But the very concept of binary got me to thinking about our radically non-binary human nature and how it is so very at odds with our consistently binary thinking.Ā  We all have that one relative who is ā€œsuch a nice guy, except for (fill in the blank)ā€ Fill in the blank could be anything from his random use of racial slurs, his insistence on patting the waitress on the behind, or the fact that he tells jokes about Asians.Ā  He doesnā€™t cheat on his wife (but maybe on his taxes), he doesnā€™t use drugs, he holds open doors for people.Ā  Exceptā€¦

So is this character a good person or a bad person?Ā  Binary says: yes/no.Ā  Non-binary says: depends on other factors ā€“ Iā€™ll have to really think about this.Ā  Iā€™ll have to think about my own moral stand on multiple issues.Ā  And also, does he kick puppies? Because thatā€™s a deal breaker.

From a writing standpoint, this is the kind of thing thatā€™s fascinating to explore.Ā  But in real life, during an election season, itā€™s made Thanksgiving a cringe worthy holiday where we all go and wonder if Republican Uncle Bob is going to get more than his turkey sliced if he brings up Trump to Democrat Aunt Jane.Ā  I donā€™t have the answers.Ā  Iā€™m not sure any of us do.Ā  Thatā€™s why binary is so attractive.Ā  Make the decision, Ā yes/no, and then I donā€™t have to think about it anymore.Ā  Non-binary means I have to keep revisiting the topic ā€“ to keep thinking.Ā  If binary trims away the indecision, then it also trims away the additional factors ā€“ the pluses.Ā  Ā Good/bad.Ā  Yes/no. Happy/sad. Grateful/non-grateful.Ā  Is that what we want the answer to be?

If thatā€™s the way itā€™s going to be, Iā€™m going to call this whole thing to a halt.

— Gumboots, Paul Simon

And now if youā€™ll excuse, I hear a pumpkin pie calling my name.

Dystopian Games

Youā€™re stuck in a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean with 8 strangers and no food or water, who do you eat first?

Dystopian novels have held a prominent place on our national reading lists for the last few years and while I occasionally enjoy a jaunt into the horrific futures that we could create for ourselves they donā€™t really speak to me.Ā  To me they frequently seem like the ultimate lifeboat game. While occasionally itā€™s fun to work through the logic of how to survive in a treacherous situation, the real answer to any lifeboat game is to not get stuck in the lifeboat in the first place.

zombie-id

I was reminded of this principle recently when I visited a conference for my day job (graphic design). The conference was for public works personnel (AKA everyone who keeps your city functioning) and their lunch speaker spoke on how their department had handled an earthquake.Ā  From personnel rotation, calling in reinforcements, clearing roadways, reviewing housing safety, clean up ā€“ this department moved swiftly with the goal of maintaining safety and returning their town to normal in the shortest amount of time possible (and they did a great job).Ā  But having just read a dystopian novel I was struck by the realization that not one person in the room was thinkingā€¦ ā€œBob, Iā€™d eat Bob.ā€Ā  They werenā€™t playing the game ā€“ they were strategizing about how to not get stuck on the lifeboat.

All of this led to four thoughts. Ā One ā€“ Iā€™m incredibly grateful for our public works personnel.Ā  From sewer maintenance, to bridge engineers, to water management, they deserve more recognition than they get.Ā  Two – All of you great public employees are screwing up a perfectly good dystopian plot line RIGHT NOW.Ā Ā  Weā€™re not supposed to be coming together to overcome a natural disaster and working for the common good!Ā  Come on, people.Ā  Where is the divisive hatred and the reaching for the shotguns? Thatā€™s it; Iā€™m breaking out the zombies.Ā  Bob is going to be dinner if I have to have three plot contrivances before breakfast. Ā Three ā€“ We as society need to invest more in infrastructure.Ā  And four ā€“ Because we donā€™t invest more in infrastructure we all need to have 3 days to 2 weeks of supplies on hand depending on where you live.Ā  Be prepared. Donā€™t let a dystopian novel happen to you.

zombie-e1305310249480

Writers vs. Readers

Writerā€™s Group: to gather with others to read and critique excerpts of written work

Reading Group: to gather with others to read and critique books, drink and snack

When done correctly, a writerā€™s group can operate as an auxiliary brain or a training ground to push a writer forward in her craft.Ā  They can be fun, inspiring and incredibly helpful. They can also be a sucking hole of negativity and wasted time.

With that in mind, it was with some trepidation that I recently tested out a new group. The hostess had a dog (bonus points) and they had established a rule of positivity and compliments before critiques (nice).Ā  They had a time keeper and a word count on the segments we read (organized!). Each writer was doing different genres and styles, but that had the benefit of bringing diverse points of view to the table.Ā  In general, it was great. It provided very valuable feedback and I can only hope that I was equally helpful to the other writers.

However, in specific, it was wee bit disappointing as there were no beverages or snacks.Ā  The reasoning ā€“ that hosting the group was enough trouble and that we were here to do actual serious work, not carouse ā€“ makes total, logical, absolute sense. Ā But in the sense of ā€œitā€™s been a long week, and Bethany wants a potato chip and a glass of somethingā€ it was less than I had hoped for.

I think, possibly what I was really hoping for was a Reading Group.Ā  Every Reading Group Iā€™ve ever attended came with crackers, cheese, and wine ā€“ the three low effort food groups. Now, in defense of the writerā€™s group, very few Reading Groupā€™s Iā€™ve ever attended actually stayed entirely on topic. Ā There was a lot ofā€¦ uhā€¦ digression, shall we say.Ā  And time keeping was absolute disaster.Ā  And learning was sort of ancillary by-product of reading a book I didnā€™t pick out, but gosh darn it, the artichoke dip was fantastic.

So next month?Ā  Iā€™ll be packing my own snacks to the writers group.Ā  After all, that group comes with a dog.

Halloween Contest!

The Dingbat Approach

This month at the Stiletto Gang we’ve been talking about transitions and how moving to a new stage of life can affect writing. But I have to admit that as I sat down to think about the topic all I found myself pondering was the actual literal transitions of writing. One of the primary tasks of a writer is to choose not just what to include, but what to leave out. There are very few (if any?) novels that are told in one long continuous stream of time. And every time the writer skips over the trip to the bathroom or the drive from point A to point B she must choose how to indicate that transition.

Chapter 1
The Hard, Fast Break

Some writers like to make each new location or time switch a new chapter.Ā  It’s concrete. It’s self explanatory. And pretty hard for the reader to get confused. But others like to the soft break.

***

In the typography world those little asterisks are called dingbats. They come in all shapes and sizes and can be themed to the text. Karen Harris Tully‘s series The Faarian Chronicles is a sci-fi young adult adventure centered on a planet that was settled by Amazon warriors of Earth. This gives the featured culture of the planet a Greek historical context (and strong feminist heroines) and makes the transition dingbats of the omega symbol fun and appropriate.

blank space

The softest break of all is the extra space.Ā  As a graphic designer, I’m not in favor of these. It’s far too easy, in a longer work, for the extra space to get buried at the end of the page. Then what does the designer do? Force the text to start lower down on the next page? That looks awkward and can lead to confusion on the part of the reader. Not to mention the fact that coding these for the e-readers and online is more than a little bit difficult. Ā In other words, if I see these in a book I immediately think the writer is a jerk who doesn’t care about how much extra work their designer has to do.

im_a_designer_not_a_screwdriver_poster-rcc06134967db4a5d92aae443a039d1e6_wvx_8byvr_512Foolishly, when I first got into the publishing biz I found myself incredibly surprised when my layout manuscript came back for proofing that the designer had kept all of my transitions as I had typed them. Somehow I genuinely thought that I would send off my MS and somewhere out in New York someone would do something clever with my transitions.Ā  I was kind of sad.Ā  I didn’t want to manage my own transitions – I wanted someone else to do all the work for me.

Which when I think about it, is about what I think about life transitions as well. How unfortunate that there’s no magic wand or designer to outsource those problems to.Ā  I guess I’m just going to put my lifestyle setting on “dingbat” and see what I get.

 


Originally published at the Stiletto Gang on 09.14.16

Market Research

As IĀ have been exploring the question ā€œWho are you like?ā€ this month, Iā€™ve also been exploring what other books in my genres look like.Ā  This is sometimes gratifying on the base level of my fonts are so much better than yours and also sometimes mystifying on the level 51rIIiVsAeLof why are there so many bared midriffs in contemporary fantasy?Ā  On the topic of midriffs, and purely for exampleā€™s sake, Iā€™ll put the cover of Shifting Jock in Love here.Ā  The cover is obviouslyā€¦ uhā€¦ fully functional, because I canā€™t stop staring at the uhā€¦ weight lifting bar.Ā  Now that weā€™ve covered that topic (no, we havenā€™t covered anything?), let me move on to my point.

Market research, which is what I call shopping and (gently) making fun of book covers over a glass of wine, is important.Ā  Itā€™s hard to review my own book cover submissions if I donā€™t know what the trends are.Ā  Not that trends should inform every decision, but I like to know how far out of the current Iā€™m swimming. In addition to finding the occasional good idea that I could be copying, I also find really interesting authors.Ā  Research shows that most people buy books based on word of mouth, but in this online age, that canā€™t ALWAYS be true.Ā  From Facebook to google ads, to the wonders of Amazon, we get a lot of recommendations about authors and books online. Ā And without a person to ask, readers are stuck trying to answer ā€œso who are they likeā€ question based on the marketing surrounding the book.Ā  But as we all learned in grade school, you canā€™t always judge a book by itā€™s cover.

One great resource Iā€™ve found in my wading around the internet is a great website – www.literature-map.comĀ  Simply type in an author you like and it will produce of an animated cloud of similar authors aka a handy new To Be Read list.Ā  And you can click on the question mark in the corner if you want to add authors to the database to improve results.Ā  And now if youā€™ll excuse me, Iā€™m going to go enjoy a little more market research and a Riesling.

 

Originally published on 8/24/16 at the Stiletto Gang

Who are you like?

One of the most common questions a writer hears is: Who are you like?Ā  In other words, what (famous, more talented, richer, that I would have heard of) author are you like?Ā  Of course, as authors we would always like to respond ā€“ I am like no one! I am a unique snowflake of infinite genius!Ā  Bow down before my staggering work of novelistic achievement!Ā  Possibly at this point is where we also start investing in a parrot, flowing robes, and a pencil thin moustache to twirl.Ā  Iā€™m not saying all authors would go full Disney villain. Clearly, the eyebrows and make-up require a more high-maintenance lifestyle than most of us are cut out for.Ā  Iā€™m just saying, nobody likes to think of themselves, as ā€œjust likeā€ somebody else.

However, temper-tantrums and eyeliner aside, it is a useful question.Ā  It does let people know where they should look for you in the library and where you fall on their reader spectrum.Ā  For the record, I usually answer this question with ā€“ Janet Evanovich.Ā  My series Carrie Mae Mysteries is female centered spy series, with plenty of hunks, humor, and huge action scenes.Ā  However, I also write in another genre ā€“ contemporary fantasy.Ā  I write modern day fairy tales about fairies, vampires, and what happens when a mermaid meets a SEAL.

Writing in multiple genres used to be very ā€œnot doneā€ because the publishing houses found it hard to market.Ā  The prevailing wisdom was that readers donā€™t read multiple genres (uhā€¦ say what?), Self-publishing has opened the door for authors to write whatever their unique snowflake heartā€™s desire, but itā€™s still a risk, and a challenge for those doing the marketing, to figure out what to say to the question ā€“ who do you write like?

I guess for now, Iā€™ll have to go with this answer ā€“ I write like my fingers are fire with sheer greatness and my mascara is totally, totally on point.

***

Originally posted on 8.10.16 at The Stilettog Gang

 

Cranking (Toddler) Tunes

Many things change after having a baby.Ā  And I have to say that one of the things that Iā€™m the most sad to see change is the amount of music I listen to.Ā  Baby nap times seem to encompass the whole dang day! I used to have iTunes running almost constantly.Ā  Not that it wasnā€™t a battle with my husband over what to listen to.Ā  No, I donā€™t want more Phish.Ā  And thereā€™s only so much hip-hop and Grateful Dead I can listen to before going insane. (Yes, my husband is a hippy with a secret love of 90ā€™s R&B.Ā  He compensates for this deficiency by being ruggedly handsome and having the miraculous ability to open jars and kill countless spiders.)

The interesting thing is that, aside from the specific bands, where my husband I deviate in our musical tastes is an actual love of music.Ā  He loves music.Ā  Phish, Dave Matthews, the Allman Brothers, and the Grateful Dead all have one thing common.Ā  OK, take a toke and make that two things ā€“ theyā€™re jam bands.Ā  I hate jam bands.Ā  Itā€™s just giant swaths of useless music that take away from the important thing ā€“ the lyrics.Ā  I love the words. (Surprised?Ā  Probably not.)Ā  For me, music is like poetry with half the pretentiousness and way more shake-your-bootiliciousness.Ā  And I like to play it ALL the time particularly when Iā€™m working.Ā  I find that music helps put me in the zone for writing and for design.

But with an in-home office and a baby, itā€™s become a lot more difficult to crank the tunes through the work day.Ā  I was excited when the baby hit two and it became easier to send her to daycare/babysitting and thereā€™s only one nap to contend with, but it has also meant that sheā€™s tons more verbal.Ā  With a toddler in the house, I donā€™t feel quite so comfortable cranking up a few of the songs I love, like Donā€™t Shoot Me Santa by The Killers.Ā  I am perfectly prepared to explain that boys have a penis and some people are in wheelchairs and sometimes boys marry boys and girls marry girls.Ā  Butā€¦ I am not at all prepared to explain why Santa is shooting that guy in the song.Ā  Iā€™m pretty sure I see headphones in my future.

 

***

Originally posted on 7.27.16 at The Stiletto Gang

The Red String of My Mind

In the cop shows, whenever the intrepid detective (Watching the Detectives, Elvis Costello) is working on the massive conspiracy that killed her mother/lover/those six girls we never met, but who really give our character a reason to act, the case is always shown as pictures (Pictures of You, The Cure) tacked up and connected by red string. I donā€™t know what set designer came up with the red string, but they ought to get royalties. Itā€™s so common that if I worked at a craft store and someone bought red string Iā€™d think they were a serial killer, a cop thrown off the force for refusing to quit the case, or a grandmother of toddlers stocking up for Christmas. I bring this up for the reason that it is a fitting visual for the song lyric littered wasteland (Teenage Wasteland, The Who) that is my brain.

Whenever I have a story noodling around in my head, but havenā€™t moved it to the level of having an outline, my natural writing style is to pick out scenes that I want to write, type them up, and save each scene to itā€™s own word document. As you can imagine, this creates a number of random word documents that might be hard to keep track of. But I have a system, most often Iā€™ll name the document the song lyric associated with it. As a book grows, frequently these scenes become chapters, and those document names become chapter titles. Which is why the original table of contents for Bulletproof Mascara, the first of my Carrie Mae Mystery novels, read more like a playlist than serious literary subtitles. Sadly, editor made me change most of them ā€“ now they simply hint at the songs they reference. Apparently, the only people more uptight that literary rights lawyers or music rights lawyers. But you can still rock out to the Bulletproof Mascara playlist simply by visiting my youtube page (youtube.com/CarrieMaeMysteries) ā€“ please enjoy the musical stylings of David Bowie, James Brown, Simon & Garfunkel, Tech9, Morcheeba, and (of course) more.

Originally posted on 7/13/16 at The Stiletto Gang