I was staring at an app advertisement on my phone the other day when a brilliant idea for a novel came to me. Iām not going to tell you what it is, because itās awesome and I donāt want the net gremlins to steal it. But as I pondered the awesomeness that was my own idea, and then shining beacon of sheer stunning gloriferousness that is my brain (Yeah, I just made that word up. What are you going to do about it?), it occurred to me to wonder ā what would happen to me if I didnāt have my brain?
And ok, yeah, obviously, dead. Plop. But what about if I had someone elseās brain? We all look at the world from the unique transponder of our brains. We see the world differently, if only by a hair, than the person sitting next to us.
For example, I have a friend who is somewhere around seven feet tall. Thatās not an exaggeration, thatās his actual height. We met in college and we had several classes, including life drawing, together. (Life drawing, for those who havenāt been to art school, is code for ādrawing naked people.ā) For one semester our life drawing instructor was a curly haired, 5ā2ā dreamer who once suggested that zoning out while driving on the freeway was a good place to get creative ideas. (We donāt have time to really go into that statement.) Anyway, at some point, she went around to my friendās drawing board and suggested that his perspective was wrong. He checked, he double checked, he thought about it, and then politely suggested that he really did have it right. She stared up at him, she stared at the model. Then she drug a chair over next to him and climbed up on it. āOh, nope, youāre right.ā Your perspective is just different when youāre an extra two feet up in the air.
Two feet and an entire picture changes. If I had someone elseās brain, surely the ideas I have for writing books would be totally different. If I had them at all. But since I love my ideas, I love my brain, I donāt think Iāll be heading to Dr. Frankensteinās lab to test out that experiment. But go ahead and thank your brain today, because itās awesome.
The other night I dreamed that fellow Stiletto Gang author Linda Rodriguez rewrote the back-story on the main character of my Carrie Mae Mystery series ā Nikk Lanier. Nikki is a twenty-something red-headed linguistics major turned superspy with an overbearing mother and a steady boyfriend who works for the CIA. Notice how none of that background involves a whirlwind marriage and divorce from a blonde lawyer and the adoption of an African orphan? But by the time my dream Linda was done thatās what Nikki had. And in my dream, I kept thinking, āMaybe I could make the divorce work, but what am I supposed to do with a baby? I canāt just send it back!ā And then I woke up in a cold editorial sweat trying to figure out I was going to jam all these changes into Nikkiās next adventure that Iām 30,000 words into with no place to add in a spare baby.
What I love is that in my dream, never once did I question why Linda was rewriting Nikkiās backstory, and it certainly never occurred to me that I could just reject the edits. Nope, once Linda wrote it down, it was set in stone. Never mind that Linda and I have never actually met in person or done any writing together what-so-ever. In my dream, the changes were done and that was that. The other odd thing about my dream was the very real dual reality of Nikkiās reality. Linda may have written it, but I couldnāt send the baby back to the orphanage because Nikki would be upset, and what would her friends think?
But once I woke up, calmed down and then stopped laughing, it occurred to me to wonder. Do other authors dream about other authors? Do they dream about their characters? Is my brain off the deep end or just averagely crazy? I may never know the answer to that oneā¦
When I was in college there was a hierarchy of artsy-ness. The fine artists looked down on the graphic designers, who looked down on the production people, who had to make do with looking down on people outside the art department. Web designers and Illustrators had to float around the edges and hope that no one eliminated their department before they graduated. I could never figure out why the fine arts students were so high and mighty – they were at a state school studying painting. It seemed wildly clear to me that their degree was a complete waste of daddy’s money. It was my opinion that the graphic designers were just as creative as fine artists; we just happened to be practical enough to want jobs after graduation. Such sentiments were far to mercenary for the art department where creativity only had to serve it’s own purpose and things like deadline’s, client needs, and money were all too, too pedestrian to be considered. Which seemed silly to me since even if you became a wildly successful painter you were going to come up against deadlines (we need 12 paintings for your gallery show in September!), client needs (the White House says the portrait can’t be a nude), and money (don’t worry your pretty little head about money!), why not learn how to manage these every day things? Wouldn’t that make you more successful? The resounding answer from the art department seemed to be that such thoughts would stifle the creativity.
And when it came to art, I had no problem shaking my head at their silliness. The only place I allowed myself that kind of indulgent largesse was in writing. I would be out tip-toeing through the tulips of my imaginary worlds for months at a time. But as I have gotten older and more experienced in the craft of writing I have discovered two problems with this. One – the product frequently is not what is needed. Too much wandering down unprofitable by-ways and I come back to the main plot of the story with about 100 pages of random stuff that don’t serve the story at all, but because I’ve just spent months on them, I love them too much to cut. Two – I don’t have the time. I now have a husband, a daughter, and a business to attend to and they all have a legitimate claim to my time. And how is the dog supposed to get any attention if I’m off typingā¦ again? (Hint: He has to look gosh darn adorable.) So, my solution? Schedules and outlines. Those two foes of creativity have become my friends. With a strong outline my writing is faster and more productive than the days when I sat down at the computer wondering what to write today. I’m not sure how anyone else manages (and I’d love to hear other people’s experiences), but I’m hanging my hat on a schedule and an outline.
https://bethanymaines.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Aug2016-Logo-op3-300x69.png00Bethany Maineshttps://bethanymaines.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Aug2016-Logo-op3-300x69.pngBethany Maines2014-08-13 01:06:052014-08-11 15:10:25Creativity vs. Time
Recently, I was ranting on Facebook about my hatred for the periods in a.m. and p.m as well as the comma between city and state in addresses (see what you miss by not being my Facebook friend?) and one of my friends posted a link to Weird Al Yankovicās new song āWord Crimes.āĀ As a long time Weird Al enthusiast and a Facebook friend to several editors and writers I had already seen the video (click here if you havenāt).Ā The video parodies āBlurred Lines,ā Robin Thickeās insanely catchy hit from 2013.Ā If you havenāt heard that one, then you probably werenāt living in America all of last year, but here you go ā Blurred Lines.Ā (Warning: may not be suitable for work and my cause you to get in arguments with your feminist friends over whether or not the song is ārape-yā.Ā Double Warning: If you use the word rape-y at me, I will smite you.)Ā But back to the story, as I watched the Weird Al version again (because why wouldnāt you?) I was caught by the line āYou do not use āitāsā in this case!ā
But why donāt we?Ā Yes, yes, the current rules state that āitāsā is a contraction.Ā āItā is not possessive; āitā cannot own anything.Ā But I say, āListen up English ā if youāre not going to provide me with a gender neutral pronoun, why canāt I use the defacto pronoun already in use in conversation ā it?āĀ Clearly, the language is lacking such a word. English should stop being stuffy and allow this clearly needed possessive to enter the dictionary.Ā Iād willingly delete ātweepā from the Oxford-English Dictionary if I could have āitās.āĀ Whoās with me?
https://bethanymaines.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Aug2016-Logo-op3-300x69.png00Bethany Maineshttps://bethanymaines.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Aug2016-Logo-op3-300x69.pngBethany Maines2014-07-23 12:30:202023-03-10 17:51:46The Case for It’s
The premise of my Carrie Mae Mystery series is that in the sixties, while other ladies were burning their bras and inventing Tupperware, Carrie Mae Robart founded a door to door / friend to friend cosmetic selling empire ā Carrie Mae Cosmetics. Her goal was to give women financial independence without having to work outside the home. However, the more women she met, the more she realized that there were some problems that couldnāt be solved with just money Āā some problems needed a fist in the face. So Carrie Mae set up the Carrie Mae Foundation. Financed by proceeds from the cosmetic sales, the foundation is part non-profit – working on pro-bono legal cases and lobbying government on womenās rights issues – and partly a women only, black-ops, elite fighting force. The heroines of my stories Nikki Lanier, Ellen Marson, Jenny Baxter and Jane Rozmarek are part of that force and they travel the world, fulfilling the Carrie Mae mission statement: helping women everywhere.
Now the thing youāll notice about this premise is that itās only partially based in reality. I mean, sure, itās possible for a woman in the 1960ās to found a peer to peer make up sales company. Not that I know of anyā¦ ahem. But sadly, it has apparently never occurred to anyone to found an elite fighting force for women as part their non-profit. (If someone knows of one, please email me immediately; I would like to join up.) The problem with all of this lack of reality is that I have to make it sound plausible when writing. And that means all the other bits have to sound real. I have to research the guns and the locations and I try to make sure that my characters emotions feel authentic. But if I spend too much time in reality, I suddenly look at my own premise and think, āThatās ridiculous! I canāt write that.ā
Thatās right; I tell myself, āI canāt.ā Those are some of the worst words in the English language. (Although, theyāre still not as bad as, āWe need to talk.ā) Iām two books and two short stories, and half a manuscript into a series, andā¦ I canāt? How does the Canāt Gremlin sneak into so many places? I thought I was well fortified behind the Walls of Fantasy; girded by the Armor of Gumption; defended by the Holy Force of Imagination. And yetā¦ I canāt. Why is it so hard to get that jerk of a gremlin out of the house? Canāt have an elite fighting force? You might as well suggest that a woman canāt write books. The cycle of Canāt can be extremely hard to break, so when I get too down in the Canāts, I like to read other peopleās books. Thereās nothing like a good trip through someone elseās imagination to leave the Canāt Gremlin in the dust. But still, I know heās just waiting around the corner to trip me up. Which is why I prefer to visit reality infrequently and for only brief periods of time. Feel free to visit me any time, but leave your gremlins at the door ā I canāt be bothered with Canāt today.
https://bethanymaines.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Aug2016-Logo-op3-300x69.png00Bethany Maineshttps://bethanymaines.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Aug2016-Logo-op3-300x69.pngBethany Maines2014-07-08 15:05:372014-07-08 15:05:37Don’t Feed the Gremlins
Brainiac
/in General WritingI was staring at an app advertisement on my phone the other day when a brilliant idea for a novel came to me. Iām not going to tell you what it is, because itās awesome and I donāt want the net gremlins to steal it. But as I pondered the awesomeness that was my own idea, and then shining beacon of sheer stunning gloriferousness that is my brain (Yeah, I just made that word up. What are you going to do about it?), it occurred to me to wonder ā what would happen to me if I didnāt have my brain?
And ok, yeah, obviously, dead. Plop. But what about if I had someone elseās brain? We all look at the world from the unique transponder of our brains. We see the world differently, if only by a hair, than the person sitting next to us.
For example, I have a friend who is somewhere around seven feet tall. Thatās not an exaggeration, thatās his actual height. We met in college and we had several classes, including life drawing, together. (Life drawing, for those who havenāt been to art school, is code for ādrawing naked people.ā) For one semester our life drawing instructor was a curly haired, 5ā2ā dreamer who once suggested that zoning out while driving on the freeway was a good place to get creative ideas. (We donāt have time to really go into that statement.) Anyway, at some point, she went around to my friendās drawing board and suggested that his perspective was wrong. He checked, he double checked, he thought about it, and then politely suggested that he really did have it right. She stared up at him, she stared at the model. Then she drug a chair over next to him and climbed up on it. āOh, nope, youāre right.ā Your perspective is just different when youāre an extra two feet up in the air.
Two feet and an entire picture changes. If I had someone elseās brain, surely the ideas I have for writing books would be totally different. If I had them at all. But since I love my ideas, I love my brain, I donāt think Iāll be heading to Dr. Frankensteinās lab to test out that experiment. But go ahead and thank your brain today, because itās awesome.
Dreams
/in Carrie Mae, General WritingWhat I love is that in my dream, never once did I question why Linda was rewriting Nikkiās backstory, and it certainly never occurred to me that I could just reject the edits. Nope, once Linda wrote it down, it was set in stone. Never mind that Linda and I have never actually met in person or done any writing together what-so-ever. In my dream, the changes were done and that was that. The other odd thing about my dream was the very real dual reality of Nikkiās reality. Linda may have written it, but I couldnāt send the baby back to the orphanage because Nikki would be upset, and what would her friends think?
But once I woke up, calmed down and then stopped laughing, it occurred to me to wonder. Do other authors dream about other authors? Do they dream about their characters? Is my brain off the deep end or just averagely crazy? I may never know the answer to that oneā¦
Creativity vs. Time
/in General WritingWhen I was in college there was a hierarchy of artsy-ness. The fine artists looked down on the graphic designers, who looked down on the production people, who had to make do with looking down on people outside the art department. Web designers and Illustrators had to float around the edges and hope that no one eliminated their department before they graduated. I could never figure out why the fine arts students were so high and mighty – they were at a state school studying painting. It seemed wildly clear to me that their degree was a complete waste of daddy’s money. It was my opinion that the graphic designers were just as creative as fine artists; we just happened to be practical enough to want jobs after graduation. Such sentiments were far to mercenary for the art department where creativity only had to serve it’s own purpose and things like deadline’s, client needs, and money were all too, too pedestrian to be considered. Which seemed silly to me since even if you became a wildly successful painter you were going to come up against deadlines (we need 12 paintings for your gallery show in September!), client needs (the White House says the portrait can’t be a nude), and money (don’t worry your pretty little head about money!), why not learn how to manage these every day things? Wouldn’t that make you more successful? The resounding answer from the art department seemed to be that such thoughts would stifle the creativity.
And when it came to art, I had no problem shaking my head at their silliness. The only place I allowed myself that kind of indulgent largesse was in writing. I would be out tip-toeing through the tulips of my imaginary worlds for months at a time. But as I have gotten older and more experienced in the craft of writing I have discovered two problems with this. One – the product frequently is not what is needed. Too much wandering down unprofitable by-ways and I come back to the main plot of the story with about 100 pages of random stuff that don’t serve the story at all, but because I’ve just spent months on them, I love them too much to cut. Two – I don’t have the time. I now have a husband, a daughter, and a business to attend to and they all have a legitimate claim to my time. And how is the dog supposed to get any attention if I’m off typingā¦ again? (Hint: He has to look gosh darn adorable.) So, my solution? Schedules and outlines. Those two foes of creativity have become my friends. With a strong outline my writing is faster and more productive than the days when I sat down at the computer wondering what to write today. I’m not sure how anyone else manages (and I’d love to hear other people’s experiences), but I’m hanging my hat on a schedule and an outline.
The Case for It’s
/in General WritingRecently, I was ranting on Facebook about my hatred for the periods in a.m. and p.m as well as the comma between city and state in addresses (see what you miss by not being my Facebook friend?) and one of my friends posted a link to Weird Al Yankovicās new song āWord Crimes.āĀ As a long time Weird Al enthusiast and a Facebook friend to several editors and writers I had already seen the video (click here if you havenāt).Ā The video parodies āBlurred Lines,ā Robin Thickeās insanely catchy hit from 2013.Ā If you havenāt heard that one, then you probably werenāt living in America all of last year, but here you go ā Blurred Lines.Ā (Warning: may not be suitable for work and my cause you to get in arguments with your feminist friends over whether or not the song is ārape-yā.Ā Double Warning: If you use the word rape-y at me, I will smite you.)Ā But back to the story, as I watched the Weird Al version again (because why wouldnāt you?) I was caught by the line āYou do not use āitāsā in this case!ā
But why donāt we?Ā Yes, yes, the current rules state that āitāsā is a contraction.Ā āItā is not possessive; āitā cannot own anything.Ā But I say, āListen up English ā if youāre not going to provide me with a gender neutral pronoun, why canāt I use the defacto pronoun already in use in conversation ā it?āĀ Clearly, the language is lacking such a word. English should stop being stuffy and allow this clearly needed possessive to enter the dictionary.Ā Iād willingly delete ātweepā from the Oxford-English Dictionary if I could have āitās.āĀ Whoās with me?
Don’t Feed the Gremlins
/in Carrie Mae, General WritingThe premise of my Carrie Mae Mystery series is that in the sixties, while other ladies were burning their bras and inventing Tupperware, Carrie Mae Robart founded a door to door / friend to friend cosmetic selling empire ā Carrie Mae Cosmetics. Her goal was to give women financial independence without having to work outside the home. However, the more women she met, the more she realized that there were some problems that couldnāt be solved with just money Āā some problems needed a fist in the face. So Carrie Mae set up the Carrie Mae Foundation. Financed by proceeds from the cosmetic sales, the foundation is part non-profit – working on pro-bono legal cases and lobbying government on womenās rights issues – and partly a women only, black-ops, elite fighting force. The heroines of my stories Nikki Lanier, Ellen Marson, Jenny Baxter and Jane Rozmarek are part of that force and they travel the world, fulfilling the Carrie Mae mission statement: helping women everywhere.
Now the thing youāll notice about this premise is that itās only partially based in reality. I mean, sure, itās possible for a woman in the 1960ās to found a peer to peer make up sales company. Not that I know of anyā¦ ahem. But sadly, it has apparently never occurred to anyone to found an elite fighting force for women as part their non-profit. (If someone knows of one, please email me immediately; I would like to join up.) The problem with all of this lack of reality is that I have to make it sound plausible when writing. And that means all the other bits have to sound real. I have to research the guns and the locations and I try to make sure that my characters emotions feel authentic. But if I spend too much time in reality, I suddenly look at my own premise and think, āThatās ridiculous! I canāt write that.ā
Thatās right; I tell myself, āI canāt.ā Those are some of the worst words in the English language. (Although, theyāre still not as bad as, āWe need to talk.ā) Iām two books and two short stories, and half a manuscript into a series, andā¦ I canāt? How does the Canāt Gremlin sneak into so many places? I thought I was well fortified behind the Walls of Fantasy; girded by the Armor of Gumption; defended by the Holy Force of Imagination. And yetā¦ I canāt. Why is it so hard to get that jerk of a gremlin out of the house? Canāt have an elite fighting force? You might as well suggest that a woman canāt write books. The cycle of Canāt can be extremely hard to break, so when I get too down in the Canāts, I like to read other peopleās books. Thereās nothing like a good trip through someone elseās imagination to leave the Canāt Gremlin in the dust. But still, I know heās just waiting around the corner to trip me up. Which is why I prefer to visit reality infrequently and for only brief periods of time. Feel free to visit me any time, but leave your gremlins at the door ā I canāt be bothered with Canāt today.